Turborotalia possagnoensis Tourmarkine & Bolli 1970 from: Pearson, P.N.Olsson, R.K.Hemleben, C.Huber, B.T.Berggren, W.A. (2006): Atlas of Eocene Planktonic Foraminifera. p. 1-513 . |
Notice: This catalogue page may contain unedited data.
|
Species Turborotalia possagnoensis Tourmarkine & Bolli 1970 |
|
|
Diagnosis / Definition: |
Pearson et al. (2006):
DESCRIPTION.
Type of wall: Weakly cancellate in earlier
chambers, becoming smootheer with cylindrical pustules
in later chambers; tendency to defoliate.
Test morphology: Trochospiral, compressed with
3 (rarely 3 1/2) chambers in the final whorl; chambers
intlated, strongly radially compressed and appressed,
increasing moderately rapidly in size; dorsal sutures
straight or slightly curved, depressed; aperture a broad,
low arch in intra-extraumbilical position, sometimes with
a thin imperforate lip; umbilicus generally narrow;
ventral sutures slightly curved, depressed; strong
tendency for dextral coiling.
Size: Holotype length 0.38 mm, breadth 0.31mm. |
Discussion / Comments: |
Pearson et al. (2006):
DISTINGUISHING FEATURES.-
Turborotalia possagnoensis is distinguished from T. frontosa by the
flatter filial chamber, which gives the test a quadrangular
shape, by the more finely perforate wall texture and by
generally having three chambers in the final whorl. It is
distinguished from T. pomeroli by its more angular
periphery, having fewer chambers in the final whorl and
smaller size.
DISCUSSION.-
This species was originally described
as an evolutionary intermediate between T. frontosa
(which has been regarded by some as a subbotinid) and
the undisputed turborotaliid species, T pomeroli. In our
experience the morphospecies is quite rare in open ocean
settings, although common in specimens from the
Possagno area, where unfortunately the material is poorly
preserved. We have, however, found well-preserved and
closely comparable populations in wells from the
Adriatic Sea. We regard possagnoensis as a relatively
short-lived offshoot from T. frontosa, rather than an evolutionary
intermediate to pomeroli as suggested by
Toumarkine and Bolli (1970).
PHYLOGENETIC RELATIONSHIPS.-
Evolved from Turborotalia frontosa, according to Toumarkine and Bolli (1970).
STRATIGRAPHIC RANGE.-
Middle Eocene, middle
Zone E9 to upper Zone Ell (Toumarkine and Bolli,
1970).
GEOGRAPHIC DISTRIBUTION.-
Cosmopolitan; possibly
most common in northern mid-latitudes.
STABLE ISOTOPE PALEOBIOL0GY.-
Poore and
Matthews (1984) recorded this species as having
relatively negative oxygen isotope ratios indicating a
shallow water habitat. On the other hand, Pearson and
others (2001) recorded a deep, thermocline signal. |
Systematics: |
1 Superregnum Eukaryota
Regnum Protoctista
Phylum Ciliophora
Subphylum Postciliodesmatophora
Ordo Globigerinida
Superfamilia Globorotaliaceae
Superfamilia Nonionacea
Familia Globorotaliidae
Genus Turborotalia
Species Turborotalia possagnoensis
35 Ordo Foraminiferida
Superfamilia Globigerinaceae
Familia Hedbergellidae
Genus Turborotalia
Species Turborotalia possagnoensis
|
Synonym list: |
Pearson et al. (2006):
p 1953 Globigerina frontosa Subbotina. - Subbotina : p.84 pl. 12; fig. 5a-c (paratype) (not holotype); [upper Eocene, Foraminiferal
Layer, Green Series, Acarinina Zone (upper part),
Kuban River; N. Caucasus]; [Not Subbotina, 1953]
non 1988 Turborotalia possagnoensis Tourmarkine & Bolli. - Poore & Bybell : p.21 pl. 2; fig. 4-7 [middle Eocene Core ACGS#4, New Jersey];
[= Turborotalia pomeroli]
2006 Turborotalia possagnoensis Tourmarkine & Bolli. - Pearson et al. : p.451 pl. 15.7; fig. 1-9 (Pl. 15.7, Figs. 1-4: new SEMs of paratypes of
Globorotalia cerroazulensis possagnoensis
Toumarkine and Bolli)
|
Was used in synonym list of: |
|
Stratigraphy - absolute ages: |
FAD: 46 ± 0 [Ma], Berggren et al. (1995)
|
Specimen: |
Museum d'Histoire Naturelle de Bale, Inventory number: C26569
|
References: |
Subbotina,N.N. (1953): Iskopaemye foraminifery SSSR (Globigerinidy, Khantkenininidy i Globorotaliidy) . Trudy Vsesoyznogo Nauchno-Issledovatel'skogo Geologo-razvedochnogo Instituta (VNIGRI) Vol. 76 p. 296
Toumarkine,M. and Bolli,H.M. (1970): Evolution de Globorotalia cerroazulensis (Cole) dans l'Eocene moyen et superieur de Possagno (Italie) . Revue de Micropaleontologie Vol. 13 p. 131-145
Toumarkine,M. (1975): Middle and Late Eocene planktonic foraminifera from the northwestern Pacific, Leg 32 of the Deep Sea Drilling Project. In: Initial Reports of the Deep Sea Drilling Project Vol. 32 Eds: Larson, R.L.Moberly, R. p. 735-751
Toumarkine,M. and Luterbacher,H.P. (1985): Paleocene and Eocene Planktic Foraminifera. In: Plankton Stratigraphy p. 87-154
Poore,R.Z. and Bybell,L.. (1988): Eocene to Miocene biostratigraphy of New Jersey Core ACGS # 4: Implications for regional stratigraphy . U. S. Geological Survey Bulletin 1829 p. 1-22
Poag,C.W.. and Commeau,J.A.. (1995): Paleocene to middle Miocene planktic foraminifera of the southwestern Salisbury Embayment, Virginia and Maryland: biostratigraphy, allostratigraphy, and sequence stratigraphy . Journal of Foraminiferal Research Vol. 25 p. 134-155
Berggren,W.A.; Kent,D.V.; Swisher,C.C. and Aubry,M.P. (1995): A revised Cenozoic Geochronology and Chronostratigraphy. In: Geochronology Time Scales and Global Stratigraphic Correlation, SEPM Special Publication Vol. 54
Pearson,P.N.; Olsson,R.K.; Hemleben,C.; Huber,B.T. and Berggren,W.A. (2006): Atlas of Eocene Planktonic Foraminifera. p. 1-513
|
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 2.5 License.
|
|