Taxon Concept provided by | |
Home | Search |
TaxonConcept data set details: | ||||||
Back to Search | ||||||
Anonymous: Unedited TaxonConcept data | ||||||
Notice: This catalogue page may contain unedited data.
| ||||||
Species Indoscaphites pavana Forbes 1846 | ||||||
|
||||||
Diagnosis / Definition: | ||||||
Kennedy & Henderson (1992): DESCRIPTION.- The holotype is only 12.2 mm in diameter, with half a whorl of body chamber, and retains much of the original shell material. Coiling is moderatly involute, ammonitic rather than scaphitoid. The earliest whorls visible are compressed and rounded, but as diameter increases they become even more compressed and flat-sided. Ornament is present from the smallest diameters visible. It conists of approximately sixteen low, broad, flexuous, prorsiradiate primary ribs on the outer whorl. Initially single, they branch on the inner flank as size increases, and are accompanied by similarly flexuous growth striae. At the largest diameters preserved, these are almost falcoid; feebly concave and prorsiradiate ont hte inner flank, convex at mid-flank, and concave on the ventrolateral shoulder, where they bear small ventral clavi. The clavi are connected across the venter by a low convex rib or ribs, striae and growth lines, which also occur between ribs. The suture, which is imperfectly exposed, is little incised and of Hoploscaphites type. |
||||||
Discussion / Comments: | ||||||
Kennedy & Henderson (1992): TYPE.- Holotype, by monotypy, is BMNH C51092, the original of Fprbes 1846 (p. 110, pl. 7, fig. 5), GSC R10480, from the Valudavur Formation of Pondicherry, south India (ex Kaye and Cunliffe Collection). DISCUSSION.- The holotype of Indoscaphites pavana is easily seperated from Indoscaphites cunliffei of similar size (Pl. 5, figs. 2, 6-9), where the whorl section is broader, tubercles stronger, and ribs distant and straight, rather than crowed and flexuous. The style of ventral ornament is of the same basic type, as in the coiling, and two species are certainly congeneric. Some authors (e.g. Pervinquiere 1907) have regarded them as conspecific, but we have studied all the available specimens, including those from Tunisia; there are no intermediate forms. OCCURRENCE.- Maastrichtian of south India and Tunisia. |
||||||
Systematics: | ||||||
41 Subordo Ancyloceratina Superfamilia Scaphitaceae Familia Scaphitidae Subfamilia Scaphitinae Genus Indoscaphites Species Indoscaphites pavana |
||||||
Synonym list: | ||||||
Kennedy & Henderson (1992): 1846 Ammonites Pavana Forbes. - Forbes : p.110 pl. 7; fig. 5
1850 Ammonites Cunliffei Forbes. - d'Orbigny : p.213
1865 Ammonites Pavana Forbes. - Stoliczka : p. 90, 98
1898 Scaphites sp. Pavana Forbes. - Kossmat : 31(138)
p 1907 Scaphites Cunliffei Forbes. - PERVINQUIERE : p.124 pl. 4, fig. 41-42 only;
text-fig. 45 only
1953 Indoscaphites pavana Forbes. - Spath : p.14
1977 Indoscaphites pavana Forbes. - Phillips : p.100
1992 Indoscaphites pavana Forbes. - Kennedy & Henderson : p.715 pl. 5; fig. 1, 3-5
|
||||||
Stratigraphy - relative ages: | ||||||
Maastrichtian: Kennedy & Henderson (1992) |
||||||
References: | ||||||
Forbes,E.. (1846): d'Orbigny,A. (1850): Stoliczka,F.. (1865): Kossmat,F.. (1898): PERVINQUIERE,L.. (1907): Spath,L.F.. (1953): Phillips,D.. (1977): Kennedy,W.J.. and Henderson,R.A.. (1992): |
||||||
Anonymous: Unedited TaxonConcept data | ||||||
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 2.5 License. | ||||||
Back to Search | ||||||
Taxon relations
Ranking (experimental) |